Between success and disillusionment, the disappointing results of Planned cities in Africa. 

Planned cities are becoming increasingly common on the African continent, especially since 2000. Not that there weren’t any before this date – Yamoussoukro and Nouakchott are proof of the opposite – but simply that more than half of all planned cities recorded in Africa between 1960 and the present day have emerged since the turn of the century [1]. The urban challenge in Africa is a crucial dilemma for global development. And with good reason: “virtually all of the world’s fastest urbanizing countries today are in sub-Saharan Africa, and this region will be home to the major megacities by the end of the century” [2]. To remedy this frenetic urban momentum criss-crossing Africa, a number of governments have envisaged the creation of one or more planned cities: Vision City in Rwanda, Chrafate in Morocco, Sèmè City in Benin and many others. 

Although there is no consensus on its definition, François Choay and Pierre Merlin propose that the notion of planned cities should be understood as “a planned town whose creation has been decided by administrative means, generally as part of a regional development policy” [3]. In other words, it’s a city conceived by political actors and generally intended for specific purposes. While some of them are designed to relieve congestion in an already saturated megalopolis – Eko Atlantic City in Nigeria – others are emerging to become technological hubs with a continental reach – Konza Technopolis in Kenya – and others to experiment with new sustainable urban planning techniques – Ben Guérir in Morocco -. However, despite this spectacular flowering of planned cities in Africa, “there are often major discrepancies between plans on paper and reality” [4]. How then can we explain the successive failures of the planned cities in Africa? This article aims to highlight three aspects that explain the limitations of these cities, too often presented as miracle solutions to Africa’s numerous urban challenges.

A handicapping geographical situation

One of the factors most likely to be lacking in many planned cities is their poor geographical location. While some of them are located on the outskirts of a major metropolis, such as Zenata city for Casablanca and Tema city for Accra, others are far away. Too far to attract large population movements. Such is the case of Konza Technopolis in Kenya. Although its ambition is to relieve congestion in Nairobi and become a key technological hub on the continent, it is currently paying the price for its geographical isolation, being almost 75 km from Nairobi, the country’s capital and, above all, the nearest major city. By comparison, “Shenzhen succeeded partly because it was an outpost of Hong Kong. Similarly, Tatu, some twenty kilometers north of Nairobi city center, is better connected to the capital and its labor market. […] Konza, on the other hand, lies in splendid isolation […] on the Athi plains, where you’re more likely to see a giraffe than a human being” [5]. So it remains difficult for Konza to become the African Silicon Valley that so many want it to be. 

Cities struggling to solve profound urban problems

Another major criticism of planned cities is that many of them are unable, or not yet able, to solve the urban challenges for which they are presented as a remedy. Diamniadio in Senegal, to cite just one example, has been under construction since 2017, and was launched at the instigation of President Macky Sall [6]. While it “was supposed to relieve traffic congestion in Dakar and provide social housing […], Diamniadio has become primarily an events city, with a large sports stadium, a conference center and hotels for airlines. Fifteen years after the launch of the project, the objective of accommodating Dakar residents in need of housing has not been achieved” [7]. And for good reason, this new city is spawning stratospheric infrastructures, like those mentioned above, without in any way resolving the day-to-day concerns of Dakar’s city dwellers, who are prey to economic and social issues of the highest order. And although some civil servants come to Diamniadio to work, as ministries have been relocated there, they return to Dakar as soon as their day is done, leaving behind the 1,500 inhabitants of a city that is expected to welcome 350,000 by 2035 [8]. As a result, Diamniadio is struggling to attract the inhabitants of a congested Dakar, not least because it is becoming more of an urban entertainment and business center than a socially mixed one. 

Planned city, city for the rich?

Since planned cities are designed by political actors, they are often based on a logic of real estate profitability and international influence. As a result, many of them are accessible only to an elite, as shown by Al Sissi City. The future capital of Egypt was born of the ambition of the ruling general of the same name to rescue Cairo, the largest metropolis in Africa and the Middle East. With its 23 million inhabitants, to which two million more are added every year, Cairo is suffocated by abysmal urban mobility and sprawling urban development, both formal and informal [9]. To cope with this, pharaonic work began on Al Sissi’s new city in 2016, some forty kilometers from Cairo. Even before completion, Al-Sissi City has already come under fire. In addition to its infrastructure, which borders on the excessive – with its Iconic Tower on its way to becoming “Africa’s tallest building” and its future defense district destined to be “the world’s largest” ahead of the Pentagon – this city, which is supposed to accommodate six million souls, is above all unaffordable for the vast majority of Cairoites. This, at a time when Egyptian property prices “are rising by over 30% a year”, while “more than one in three people live below the poverty line” in the country [10]. Al-Sissi City is gradually being transformed into a huge housing estate for a particularly affluent clientele. Far from fulfilling a social function by enabling the most modest Cairo residents to settle there, this new city attracts only the very wealthy: “those who have already bought property are mostly foreigners who have no intention of living there” [11]. Last but not least, it would be worth pursuing the question of the intentional nature of the transfer of the capital from Cairo to Al-Sissi City, despite the fact that it was created ex-nihilo in the middle of the desert. According to political analyst Maged Mandour, this would enable the government to “create this distance between itself and the urban centers [recalling the Tahrir Square protests in Cairo that led to the fall of Mubarak in 2012 during the Arab Spring], so that if there is a revolt somewhere, it can put it down without this blocking it” [12]. 

Conclusions

In short, a large proportion of the African planned cities built since the beginning of this century fail to achieve the ambitions for which they were conceived, and are part of a project that serves the majority of urban populations. However, there’s no need to be defeatist, insofar as some planned cities have nonetheless managed to achieve satisfactory and encouraging results: Kilamba in Angola, Ben Guerir in Morocco, Small Farm City in Malawi and Sidi Abderrahman in Algeria are just a few examples. And if there’s one final lesson to be learned from this reflection, it’s that “it takes years for a city to settle down and become something”, to quote Jérôme Chenal. So let’s be patient!

Bibliography

[1] Villes Nouvelles en Afrique – Urbanisme Francophonie. (2024, 11 janvier). Urbanisme Francophonie. https://www.urbanisme-francophonie.org/ressource-doc/villes-nouvelles-en-afrique/

[2] Mason, J. (2023, 7 juillet). Who really benefits from new cities ? The Future Of Development.https://www.urbanisme-francophonie.org/ressource-doc/villes-nouvelles-en-afrique/

[3] Villes Nouvelles en Afrique – Urbanisme Francophonie. (2024b, janvier 11). Urbanisme Francophonie. https://www.urbanisme-francophonie.org/ressource-doc/villes-nouvelles-en-afrique/

[4] De Vergès, M. (2023, 9 octobre). « Les projets de villes nouvelles en Afrique sont déconnectés des besoins réels des populations » . Le Monde.fr. https://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2023/10/08/les-projets-de-villes-nouvelles-en-afrique-sont-deconnectes-des-besoins-reels-des-populations_6193194_3212.html

[5] Lockhart, K. (2024a, janvier 12). Can Satellite Cities Help Solve Africa&rsquo ; s Urbanisation Challenges ? The Future Of Development.
https://chartercitiesinstitute.org/media-appearances/can-satellite-cities-help-solve-africas-urbanisation-challenges/

[6 ] New Cities Map. (s. d.) https://newcitiesmap.com/map

[7] De Vergès, M. (2023b, octobre 9). « Les projets de villes nouvelles en Afrique sont déconnectés des besoins réels des populations » .Le Monde.fr
https://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2023/10/08/les-projets-de-villes-nouvelles-en-afrique-sont-deconnectes-des-besoins-reels-des-populations_6193194_3212.html

[8] RTI. (2020, 20 janvier). Made In Africa : Diamniadio (Sénégal), la ville africaine du futur [Vidéo]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_95EisRh2Oc

[9] Looking 4. (2023, 8 décembre). Sissi-City : La Nouvelle Capitale qui pourrait Ruiner l’Égypte [Vidéo]. YouTube.
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zfzzSHav8w

[10] Looking 4. (2023, 8 décembre). Sissi-City : La Nouvelle Capitale qui pourrait Ruiner l’Égypte [Vidéo]. YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zfzzSHav8w

[11] Looking 4. (2023, 8 décembre). Sissi-City : La Nouvelle Capitale qui pourrait Ruiner l’Égypte [Vidéo]. YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zfzzSHav8w

[12] The Wall Street Journal. (2023, 27 octobre). Why Egypt can’t afford its $ 58B new capital city | WSJ breaking ground [Vidéo]. YouTube. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XRpZGKifik

[13] Villes nouvelles : un bilan mitigé. (2018, 22 mars). Jeune Afrique. Consulté le 26 mars 2024, à l’adresse :
https://www.jeuneafrique.com/mag/540974/economie-entreprises/villes-nouvelles-un-bilan-mitige/

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *